razrfalcon / color-thief-rs Goto Github PK

Hi, Is it possible to expose get_dominant_color method ?

fast-colortheif exposes it like this
https://github.com/bedapisl/fast-colorthief/blob/92eda78157bed309ef9c12e85708ae21241e11d0/fast_colorthief.py#L9-L22

Hi, i have seen very slight differences, 1-3 pixels from the output from colorthief-py and color-theif

For example:

(201, 160, 118)
(202, 160, 118)


[(30, 169, 166), (179, 51, 55), (219, 176, 127), (248, 233, 225), (160, 98, 87), (63, 47, 42), (131, 163, 107), (179, 119, 52), (237, 220, 155)]
[(31, 167, 164), (179, 51, 55), (219, 176, 127), (248, 233, 225), (160, 98, 87), (62, 44, 38), (131, 162, 106), (178, 118, 51), (242, 220, 157)]

This isn't much, but do you think i can help in any way to remove this difference?

Relevant codes:
https://github.com/baseplate-admin/modern_colorthief/blob/7084bf0d59f1b8ae8ca904d3cdfe938ec22e85fe/src/lib.rs#L16-L38

Hello

Some of the results I'm getting dont seem correct.

For example, I use this red image I get results that dont appear to correspond to the image.

This is an example of the code I'm using:

let palette = match color_thief::get_palette(&img_bytes, ColorFormat::Rgb, 10, 2) {
        Ok(colors) => colors,
        Err(e) => {
            // Handle the error explicitly without using `?`
            return Err(anyhow!("Failed to get palette: {}", e));
        }
    };

And this is the json-ized result:

[
  {
    "red": 172,
    "green": 82,
    "blue": 122
  },
  {
    "red": 21,
    "green": 110,
    "blue": 153
  }
]

Hello, on master you have rgb crate version 0.8 (previous was 0.7 which is yanked) but it's not released so version from crates fail to compile now.