auryn is a recursive dependency injector. Use auryn to bootstrap and wire together S.O.L.I.D., object-oriented PHP applications.
Among other things, auryn recursively instantiates class dependencies based on the parameter type-hints specified in class constructor signatures. This requires the use of Reflection. You may have heard that "reflection is slow". Let's clear something up: anything can be "slow" if you're doing it wrong. Reflection is an order of magnitude faster than disk access and several orders of magnitude faster than retrieving information (for example) from a remote database. Additionally, each reflection offers the opportunity to cache the results if you're worried about speed. auryn caches any reflections it generates to minimize the potential performance impact.
auryn is NOT a Service Locator. DO NOT turn it into one by passing the injector into your application classes. Service Locator is an anti-pattern; it hides class dependencies, makes code more difficult to maintain and makes a liar of your API! You should only use an injector for wiring together the disparate parts of your application during your bootstrap phase.
Basic Usage
- Basic Instantiation
- Injection Definitions
- Type-Hint Aliasing
- Non-Class Parameters
- Global Parameter Definitions
Advanced Usage
- Instance Sharing
- Instantiation Delegates
- Prepares and Setter Injection
- Injecting for Execution
- Dependency Resolution
Example Use Cases
- auryn requires PHP 5.3 or higher.
You can clone the latest auryn iteration at anytime from the github repository:
$ git clone git://github.com/rdlowrey/auryn.gitYou may also use composer to include auryn as a dependency in your projects composer.json. The relevant package is rdlowrey/auryn.
Alternatively require the package using composer cli:
composer require rdlowrey/aurynArchived tagged release versions are also available for manual download on the project tags page
To start using the injector, simply create a new instance of the Auryn\Injector ("the Injector")
class:
<?php
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;If a class doesn't specify any dependencies in its constructor signature there's little point in using the Injector to generate it. However, for the sake of completeness consider that you can do the following with equivalent results:
<?php
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$obj1 = new SomeNamespace\MyClass;
$obj2 = $injector->make('SomeNamespace\MyClass');
var_dump($obj2 instanceof SomeNamespace\MyClass); // trueIf a class only asks for concrete dependencies you can use the Injector to inject them without
specifying any injection definitions. For example, in the following scenario you can use the
Injector to automatically provision MyClass with the required SomeDependency and AnotherDependency
class instances:
<?php
class SomeDependency {}
class AnotherDependency {}
class MyClass {
public $dep1;
public $dep2;
public function __construct(SomeDependency $dep1, AnotherDependency $dep2) {
$this->dep1 = $dep1;
$this->dep2 = $dep2;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$myObj = $injector->make('MyClass');
var_dump($myObj->dep1 instanceof SomeDependency); // true
var_dump($myObj->dep2 instanceof AnotherDependency); // trueOne of the Injector's key attributes is that it recursively traverses class dependency trees to
instantiate objects. This is just a fancy way of saying, "if you instantiate object A which asks for
object B, the Injector will instantiate any of object B's dependencies so that B can be instantiated
and provided to A". This is perhaps best understood with a simple example. Consider the following
classes in which a Car asks for Engine and the Engine class has concrete dependencies of its
own:
<?php
class Car {
private $engine;
public function __construct(Engine $engine) {
$this->engine = $engine;
}
}
class Engine {
private $sparkPlug;
private $piston;
public function __construct(SparkPlug $sparkPlug, Piston $piston) {
$this->sparkPlug = $sparkPlug;
$this->piston = $piston;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$car = $injector->make('Car');
var_dump($car instanceof Car); // trueYou may have noticed that the previous examples all demonstrated instantiation of classes with explicit, type-hinted, concrete constructor parameters. Obviously, many of your classes won't fit this mold. Some classes will type-hint interfaces and abstract classes. Some will specify scalar parameters which offer no possibility of type-hinting in PHP. Still other parameters will be arrays, etc. In such cases we need to assist the Injector by telling it exactly what we want to inject.
Let's look at how to provision a class with non-concrete type-hints in its constructor signature.
Consider the following code in which a Car needs an Engine and Engine is an interface:
<?php
interface Engine {}
class V8 implements Engine {}
class Car {
private $engine;
public function __construct(Engine $engine) {
$this->engine = $engine;
}
}To instantiate a Car in this case, we simply need to define an injection definition for the class
ahead of time:
<?php
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->define('Car', ['engine' => 'V8']);
$car = $injector->make('Car');
var_dump($car instanceof Car); // trueThe most important points to notice here are:
- A custom definition is an
arraywhose keys match constructor parameter names - The values in the definition array represent the class names to inject for the specified parameter key
Because the Car constructor parameter we needed to define was named $engine, our definition
specified an engine key whose value was the name of the class (V8) that we want to inject.
Custom injection definitions are only necessary on a per-parameter basis. For example, in the
following class we only need to define the injectable class for $arg2 because $arg1 specifies a
concrete class type-hint:
<?php
class MyClass {
private $arg1;
private $arg2;
public function __construct(SomeConcreteClass $arg1, SomeInterface $arg2) {
$this->arg1 = $arg1;
$this->arg2 = $arg2;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->define('MyClass', ['arg2' => 'SomeImplementationClass']);
$myObj = $injector->make('MyClass');NOTE: Injecting instances where an abstract class is type-hinted works in exactly the same way as the above examples for interface type-hints.
Injection definitions may also specify a pre-existing instance of the requisite class instead of the string class name:
<?php
interface SomeInterface {}
class SomeImplementation implements SomeInterface {}
class MyClass {
private $dependency;
public function __construct(SomeInterface $dependency) {
$this->dependency = $dependency;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$dependencyInstance = new SomeImplementation;
$injector->define('MyClass', [':dependency' => $dependencyInstance]);
$myObj = $injector->make('MyClass');
var_dump($myObj instanceof MyClass); // trueNOTE: Since this
define()call is passing raw values (as evidenced by the colon:usage), you can achieve the same result by omitting the array key(s) and relying on parameter order rather than name. Like so:$injector->define('MyClass', [$dependencyInstance]);
You may also specify injection definitions at call-time with Auryn\Injector::make. Consider:
<?php
interface SomeInterface {}
class SomeImplementationClass implements SomeInterface {}
class MyClass {
private $dependency;
public function __construct(SomeInterface $dependency) {
$this->dependency = $dependency;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$myObj = $injector->make('MyClass', ['dependency' => 'SomeImplementationClass']);
var_dump($myObj instanceof MyClass); // trueThe above code shows how even though we haven't called the Injector's define method, the
call-time specification allows us to instantiate MyClass.
NOTE: on-the-fly instantiation definitions will override a pre-defined definition for the specified class, but only in the context of that particular call to
Auryn\Injector::make.
Programming to interfaces is one of the most useful concepts in object-oriented design (OOD), and well-designed code should type-hint interfaces whenever possible. But does this mean we have to assign injection definitions for every class in our application to reap the benefits of abstracted dependencies? Thankfully the answer to this question is, "NO." The Injector accommodates this goal by accepting "aliases". Consider:
<?php
interface Engine {}
class V8 implements Engine {}
class Car {
private $engine;
public function __construct(Engine $engine) {
$this->engine = $engine;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
// Tell the Injector class to inject an instance of V8 any time
// it encounters an Engine type-hint
$injector->alias('Engine', 'V8');
$car = $injector->make('Car');
var_dump($car instanceof Car); // bool(true)In this example we've demonstrated how to specify an alias class for any occurrence of a particular interface or abstract class type-hint. Once an implementation is assigned, the Injector will use it to provision any parameter with a matching type-hint.
IMPORTANT: If an injection definition is defined for a parameter covered by an implementation assignment, the definition takes precedence over the implementation.
All of the previous examples have demonstrated how the Injector class instantiates parameters based on type-hints, class name definitions and existing instances. But what happens if we want to inject a scalar or other non-object variable into a class? First, let's establish the following behavioral rule:
IMPORTANT: The Injector assumes all named-parameter definitions are class names by default.
If you want the Injector to treat a named-parameter definition as a "raw" value and not a class name,
you must prefix the parameter name in your definition with a colon character :. For example,
consider the following code in which we tell the Injector to share a PDO database connection
instance and define its scalar constructor parameters:
<?php
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->share('PDO');
$injector->define('PDO', [
':dsn' => 'mysql:dbname=testdb;host=127.0.0.1',
':username' => 'dbuser',
':passwd' => 'dbpass'
]);
$db = $injector->make('PDO');The colon character preceding the parameter names tells the Injector that the associated values ARE
NOT class names. If the colons had been omitted above, auryn would attempt to instantiate classes of
the names specified in the string and an exception would result. Also, note that we could just as
easily specified arrays or integers or any other data type in the above definitions. As long as the
parameter name is prefixed with a :, auryn will inject the value directly without attempting to
instantiate it.
NOTE: As mentioned previously, since this
define()call is passing raw values, you may opt to assign the values by parameter order rather than name. Since PDO's first three parameters are$dsn,$username, and$password, in that order, you could accomplish the same result by leaving out the array keys, like so:$injector->define('PDO', ['mysql:dbname=testdb;host=127.0.0.1', 'dbuser', 'dbpass']);
Sometimes applications may reuse the same value everywhere. However, it can be a hassle to manually
specify definitions for this sort of thing everywhere it might be used in the app. auryn mitigates
this problem by exposing the Injector::defineParam() method. Consider the following example ...
<?php
$myUniversalValue = 42;
class MyClass {
public $myValue;
public function __construct($myValue) {
$this->myValue = $myValue;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->defineParam('myValue', $myUniversalValue);
$obj = $injector->make('MyClass');
var_dump($obj->myValue === 42); // bool(true)Because we specified a global definition for myValue, all parameters that are not in some other
way defined (as below) that match the specified parameter name are auto-filled with the global value.
If a parameter matches any of the following criteria the global value is not used:
- A typehint
- A predefined injection definition
- A custom call time definition
One of the more ubiquitous plagues in modern OOP is the Singleton anti-pattern. Coders looking to
limit classes to a single instance often fall into the trap of using static Singleton
implementations for things like configuration classes and database connections. While it's often
necessary to prevent multiple instances of a class, the Singleton method spells death to testability
and should generally be avoided. Auryn\Injector makes sharing class instances across contexts a
triviality while allowing maximum testability and API transparency.
Let's consider how a typical problem facing object-oriented web applications is easily solved by
wiring together your application using auryn. Here, we want to inject a single database connection
instance across multiple layers of an application. We have a controller class that asks for a
DataMapper that requires a PDO database connection instance:
<?php
class DataMapper {
private $pdo;
public function __construct(PDO $pdo) {
$this->pdo = $pdo;
}
}
class MyController {
private $mapper;
public function __construct(DataMapper $mapper) {
$this->mapper = $mapper;
}
}
$db = new PDO('mysql:host=localhost;dbname=mydb', 'user', 'pass');
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->share($db);
$myController = $injector->make('MyController');In the above code, the DataMapper instance will be provisioned with the same PDO database
connection instance we originally shared. This example is contrived and overly simple, but the
implication should be clear:
By sharing an instance of a class,
Auryn\Injectorwill always use that instance when provisioning classes that type-hint the shared class.
Let's look at a simple proof of concept:
<?php
class Person {
public $name = 'John Snow';
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->share('Person');
$person = $injector->make('Person');
var_dump($person->name); // John Snow
$person->name = 'Arya Stark';
$anotherPerson = $injector->make('Person');
var_dump($anotherPerson->name); // Arya Stark
var_dump($person === $anotherPerson); // bool(true) because it's the same instance!Defining an object as shared will store the provisioned instance in the Injector's shared cache and
all future requests to the provider for an injected instance of that class will return the
originally created object. Note that in the above code, we shared the class name (Person)
instead of an actual instance. Sharing works with either a class name or an instance of a class.
The difference is that when you specify a class name, the Injector
will cache the shared instance the first time it is asked to create it.
NOTE: Once the Injector caches a shared instance, call-time definitions passed to
Auryn\Injector::makewill have no effect. Once shared, an instance will always be returned for instantiations of its type until the object is un-shared or refreshed:
Often factory classes/methods are used to prepare an object for use after instantiation. auryn allows you to integrate factories and builders directly into the injection process by specifying callable instantiation delegates on a per-class basis. Let's look at a very basic example to demonstrate the concept of injection delegates:
<?php
class MyComplexClass {
public $verification = false;
public function doSomethingAfterInstantiation() {
$this->verification = true;
}
}
$complexClassFactory = function() {
$obj = new MyComplexClass;
$obj->doSomethingAfterInstantiation();
return $obj;
};
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->delegate('MyComplexClass', $complexClassFactory);
$obj = $injector->make('MyComplexClass');
var_dump($obj->verification); // bool(true)In the above code we delegate instantiation of the MyComplexClass class to a closure,
$complexClassFactory. Once this delegation is made, the Injector will return the results of the
specified closure when asked to instantiate MyComplexClass.
Any valid PHP callable may be registered as a class instantiation delegate using
Auryn\Injector::delegate. Additionally you may specify the name of a delegate class that
specifies an __invoke method and it will be automatically provisioned and have its __invoke
method called at delegation time. Instance methods from uninstantiated classes may also be specified
using the ['NonStaticClassName', 'factoryMethod'] construction. For example:
<?php
class SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation {
public $value = 0;
}
class SomeFactoryDependency {}
class MyFactory {
private $dependency;
function __construct(SomeFactoryDependency $dep) {
$this->dependency = $dep;
}
function __invoke() {
$obj = new SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation;
$obj->value = 1;
return $obj;
}
function factoryMethod() {
$obj = new SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation;
$obj->value = 2;
return $obj;
}
}
// Works because MyFactory specifies a magic __invoke method
$injector->delegate('SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation', 'MyFactory');
$obj = $injector->make('SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation');
var_dump($obj->value); // int(1)
// This also works
$injector->delegate('SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation', 'MyFactory::factoryMethod');
$obj = $injector->make('SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation');
$obj = $injector->make('SomeClassWithDelegatedInstantiation');
var_dump($obj->value); // int(2)Constructor injection is almost always preferable to setter injection. However, some APIs require
additional post-instantiation mutations. auryn accommodates these use cases with its
Injector::prepare() method. Users may register any class or interface name for post-instantiation
modification. Consider:
<?php
class MyClass {
public $myProperty = 0;
}
$injector->prepare('MyClass', function($myObj, $injector) {
$myObj->myProperty = 42;
});
$myObj = $injector->make('MyClass');
var_dump($myObj->myProperty); // int(42)While the above example is contrived, the usefulness should be clear.
In addition to provisioning class instances using constructors, auryn can also recursively instantiate the parameters of any valid PHP callable. The following examples all work:
<?php
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->execute(function(){});
$injector->execute([$objectInstance, 'methodName']);
$injector->execute('globalFunctionName');
$injector->execute('MyStaticClass::myStaticMethod');
$injector->execute(['MyStaticClass', 'myStaticMethod']);
$injector->execute(['MyChildStaticClass', 'parent::myStaticMethod']);
$injector->execute('ClassThatHasMagicInvoke');
$injector->execute($instanceOfClassThatHasMagicInvoke);
$injector->execute('MyClass::myInstanceMethod');Additionally, you can pass in the name of a class for a non-static method and the injector will automatically provision an instance of the class (subject to any definitions or shared instances already stored by the injector) before provisioning and invoking the specified method:
<?php
class Dependency {}
class AnotherDependency {}
class Example {
function __construct(Dependency $dep){}
function myMethod(AnotherDependency $arg1, $arg2) {
return $arg2;
}
}
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
// outputs: int(42)
var_dump($injector->execute('Example::myMethod', $args = [':arg2' => 42]));Auryn\Injector resolves dependencies in the following order:
- If a shared instance exists for the class in question, the shared instance will always be returned
- If a delegate callable is assigned for a class, its return result will always be used
- If a call-time definition is passed to
Auryn\Injector::make, that definition will be used - If a pre-defined definition exists, it will be used
- If a dependency is type-hinted, the Injector will recursively instantiate it subject to any implementations or definitions
- If no type-hint exists and the parameter has a default value, the default value is injected
- If a global parameter value is defined that value is used
- Throw an exception because you did something stupid
Dependency Injection Containers (DIC) are generally misunderstood in the PHP community. One of the primary culprits is the misuse of such containers in the mainstream application frameworks. Often, these frameworks warp their DICs into Service Locator anti-patterns. This is a shame because a good DIC should be the exact opposite of a Service Locator.
There's a galaxy of differences between using a DIC to wire together your application versus passing the DIC as a dependency to your objects (Service Locator). Service Locator (SL) is an anti-pattern -- it hides class dependencies, makes code difficult to maintain and makes a liar of your API.
When you pass a SL into your constructors it makes it difficult to determine what the class dependencies
really are. A House object depends on Door and Window objects. A House object DOES NOT depend
on an instance of ServiceLocator regardless of whether the ServiceLocator can provide Door and
Window objects.
In real life you wouldn't build a house by transporting the entire hardware store (hopefully) to
the construction site so you can access any parts you need. Instead, the foreman (__construct())
asks for the specific parts that will be needed (Door and Window) and goes about procuring them.
Your objects should function in the same way; they should ask only for the specific dependencies
required to do their jobs. Giving the House access to the entire hardware store is at best poor
OOP style and at worst a maintainability nightmare. The takeaway here is this:
IMPORTANT: do not use auryn like a Service Locator!
A common difficulty in web applications is limiting the number of database connection instances.
It's wasteful and slow to open up new connections each time we need to talk to a database.
Unfortunately, using singletons to limit these instances makes code brittle and hard to test. Let's
see how we can use auryn to inject the same PDO instance across the entire scope of our application.
Say we have a service class that requires two separate data mappers to persist information to a database:
<?php
class HouseMapper {
private $pdo;
public function __construct(PDO $pdo) {
$this->pdo = $pdo;
}
public function find($houseId) {
$query = 'SELECT * FROM houses WHERE houseId = :houseId';
$stmt = $this->pdo->prepare($query);
$stmt->bindValue(':houseId', $houseId);
$stmt->setFetchMode(PDO::FETCH_CLASS, 'Model\\Entities\\House');
$stmt->execute();
$house = $stmt->fetch(PDO::FETCH_CLASS);
if (false === $house) {
throw new RecordNotFoundException(
'No houses exist for the specified ID'
);
}
return $house;
}
// more data mapper methods here ...
}
class PersonMapper {
private $pdo;
public function __construct(PDO $pdo) {
$this->pdo = $pdo;
}
// data mapper methods here
}
class SomeService {
private $houseMapper;
private $personMapper;
public function __construct(HouseMapper $hm, PersonMapper $pm) {
$this->houseMapper = $hm;
$this->personMapper = $pm;
}
public function doSomething() {
// do something with the mappers
}
}In our wiring/bootstrap code, we simply instantiate the PDO instance once and share it in the
context of the Injector:
<?php
$pdo = new PDO('sqlite:some_sqlite_file.db');
$pdo->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE, PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION);
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->share($pdo);
$mapper = $injector->make('SomeService');In the above code, the DIC instantiates our service class. More importantly, the data mapper classes it generates to do so are injected with the same database connection instance we originally shared.
Of course, we don't have to manually instantiate our PDO instance. We could just as easily seed
the container with a definition for how to create the PDO object and let it handle things for us:
<?php
$injector->define('PDO', [
':dsn' => 'sqlite:some_sqlite_file.db'
]);
$injector->share('PDO');
$service = $injector->make('SomeService');In the above code, the injector will pass the string definition as the $dsn argument in the
PDO::__construct method and generate the shared PDO instance automatically only if one of the
classes it instantiates requires a PDO instance!
DICs should be used to wire together the disparate objects of your application into a cohesive functional unit (generally at the bootstrap or front-controller stage of the application). One such usage provides an elegant solution for one of the thorny problems in object-oriented (OO) web applications: how to instantiate classes in a routed environment where the dependencies are not known ahead of time.
Consider the following front controller code whose job is to:
- Load a list of application routes and pass them to the router
- Generate a model of the client's HTTP request
- Route the request instance given the application's route list
- Instantiate the routed controller and invoke a method appropriate to the HTTP request
<?php
define('CONTROLLER_ROUTES', '/hard/path/to/routes.xml');
$routeLoader = new RouteLoader();
$routes = $routeLoader->loadFromXml(CONTROLLER_ROUTES);
$router = new Router($routes);
$requestDetector = new RequestDetector();
$request = $requestDetector->detectFromSuperglobal($_SERVER);
$requestUri = $request->getUri();
$requestMethod = strtolower($request->getMethod());
$injector = new Auryn\Injector;
$injector->share($request);
try {
if (!$controllerClass = $router->route($requestUri, $requestMethod)) {
throw new NoRouteMatchException();
}
$controller = $injector->make($controllerClass);
$callableController = array($controller, $requestMethod);
if (!is_callable($callableController)) {
throw new MethodNotAllowedException();
} else {
$callableController();
}
} catch (NoRouteMatchException $e) {
// send 404 response
} catch (MethodNotAllowedException $e) {
// send 405 response
} catch (Exception $e) {
// send 500 response
}And elsewhere we have various controller classes, each of which ask for their own individual dependencies:
<?php
class WidgetController {
private $request;
private $mapper;
public function __construct(Request $request, WidgetDataMapper $mapper) {
$this->request = $request;
$this->mapper = $mapper;
}
public function get() {
// do something for HTTP GET requests
}
public function post() {
// do something for HTTP POST requests
}
}In the above example the auryn DIC allows us to write fully testable, fully OO controllers that ask
for their dependencies. Because the DIC recursively instantiates the dependencies of objects it
creates we have no need to pass around a Service Locator. Additionally, this example shows how we can
eliminate evil Singletons using the sharing capabilities of the auryn DIC. In the front controller
code, we share the request object so that any classes instantiated by the Auryn\Injector that ask
for a Request will receive the same instance. This feature not only helps eliminate Singletons,
but also the need for hard-to-test static properties.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent