`let else` not suggested for refutable let patterns. about rust HOT 5 OPEN

We already suggest let/else if there is a binding at play. For example when you write let Some(x) = foo; we'll suggest let Some(x) = foo else { todo!() }; already. I don't think we should suggest let/else when there are no bindings because it would be more naturally written in the opposite way, like if foo.is_none() { todo!() } instead.

from rust.

I think it would be helpful to have a suggestion for those who expect an exact value or else the code should diverge.

from rust.

If thats not a good idea, just close with a comment.

from rust.

We can maybe add a help note, but wouldn't want to provide a structured suggestion.

from rust.

Yeah that would be nice.

from rust.