• Total Prize Pool: $60,500 USDC
  • HM awards: $42,500 USDC
  • QA report awards: $5000 USDC
  • Gas report awards: $2500 USDC
  • Judge + presort awards: $10,000 USDC
  • Scout awards: $500 USDC
• Join C4 Discord to register
• Submit findings using the C4 form
• Read our guidelines for more details
• Starts January 04, 2023 20:00 UTC
• Ends January 09, 2023 20:00 UTC

The C4audit output for the contest can be found here within an hour of contest opening.

Note for C4 wardens: Anything included in the C4udit output is considered a publicly known issue and is ineligible for awards.

Biconomy Smart Account is a smart contract wallet that builds on core concepts of Gnosis / Argent safes and implements an interface to support calls from account abstraction Entry Point contract. We took all the the good parts of existing smart contract wallets.

These smart wallets have a single owner (1/1 Multisig) and are designed in such a way that it is

• Cheap to deploy copies of a base wallet
• Wallet addresses are counterfactual in nature (you can know the address in advance and users will have the same address across all EVM chains)
• Deployment cost can be sponsored (gasless transactions by a relayer)
• Modules can be used to extend the functionality of the smart contract wallet. Concepts like multi-sig, session keys, etc also can be implemented using the MultiSig Module, SessionKey Module & so on.

All the contracts in this section are to be reviewed. Any contracts not in this list are to be ignored for this contest.

Abstract contract that implements EIP4337 IWallet interface defines set of methods (compatible with EIP and Biconomy SDK) that all Smart Wallets must implement

EIP1167 Proxy

Contract responsible for deploying smart wallets aka accounts using create2 and create Has a method to compute counter factual wallet of the address before deploying

function deployCounterFactualWallet(address _owner, address _entryPoint, address _handler, uint _index) public returns(address proxy)

salt consists of _owner and _index. _entryPoint and _handler are required to init the wallet. (contest bonus : showcase any potential front running in wallet deployment)

Base implementation contract for smart wallet

reference 1 : https://docs.gnosis-safe.io/contracts

reference 2 : https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/blob/develop/contracts/samples/SimpleAccount.sol

notes:

1. reverting methods are used for gas estimations
2. transactions happen via EOA signature by calling execTransaction or validateUserOp and execFromEntryPoint via entry point
3. currently 1-1 multisig
4. ECDSA used for signature verification. contract signatures are supported using EIP1271 (we encourage wardens to test integration of smart contract wallet for providing signature on protocols like opensea)

EIP4337 Entry Point contract (https://blog.openzeppelin.com/eth-foundation-account-abstraction-audit/)

Stake Manager for wallet and paymaster deposits / stakes https://blog.openzeppelin.com/eth-foundation-account-abstraction-audit/

helper contract to make calls and delegatecalls to dapp contracts

Fallback manager manages a fallback handler to fallback to (delegate call) when a method is not found in wallet implementation contract

Gnosis Safe module manager

Manages hooks to react to receiving tokens

Allows to batch multiple transactions into one. Relayer -> Smart Wallet - > MultiSend -> Dapp contract / contracts

MultiSend functionality but reverts if a transaction tries to do delegatecall

A paymaster that uses external service to decide whether to pay for the UserOp. The paymaster trusts an external signer to sign the transaction. The calling user must pass the UserOp to that external signer first, which performs whatever off-chain verification before signing the UserOp. Singleton Paymaster is Biconomy Paymaster which can be used by all the Dapps and manages gas accounting for their corresponding paymasterId.

Library useful for decoding paymaster data and context

https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/tree/develop/eip/assets/eip-4337

public document for Biconomy SDK that uses these smart contract wallets and account abstraction EIP4337 https://www.notion.so/biconomy/Biconomy-SDK-adf0c6cedb08436097bf099b8f46aac7

Transactional level methods are either called on EntryPoint.sol -> handleOps() or on SmartAccount.sol (delegated through Proxy.sol) -> execTransaction()

These contracts uses EIP1167 minimal proxy (Proxy.sol) to deploy a clone of implementation contract (SmartAccount.sol) The factory contract that is responsible for deploying a smart contract wallet is SmartAccountFactory.sol which has methods to getCounterFactualWalletAddress and deploy wallet (using CREATE2)

SmartAccount follows the IAccount interface proposed by EIP4337 https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337

Account abstraction EntryPoint and StakeManager contracts and interfaces

Relevant missing test cases in this repo can be found here : https://github.com/eth-infinitism/account-abstraction/tree/develop/test

Account abstraction BasePaymaster and Biconomy Singleton Paymaster

(Paymaster is a special contract that acts as a Gas Tank to sponsor the user operations, that pre deposits native token gas on the EntryPoint contract (which in turn refunds the relayer/bundler). Biconomy uses a specific paymaster implementation called VerifyingPaymaster where an off-chain signature is passed to be verified for gas sponsorship within the contract)

Helpers/ utils

Any files not listed above should be considered out of scope and assumed to be bug free.

- If you have a public code repo, please share it here:  https://github.com/bcnmy/scw-contracts/tree/master-c4-readys
- How many contracts are in scope?:   36
- Total SLoC for these contracts?:  1825
- How many external imports are there?:  1
- How many separate interfaces and struct definitions are there for the contracts within scope?:  8 interfaces, 11 structs
- Does most of your code generally use composition or inheritance?:   Yes
- What is the overall line coverage percentage provided by your tests?:  41
- Is there a need to understand a separate part of the codebase / get context in order to audit this part of the protocol?:   false
- Please describe required context:   
- Does it use an oracle?:  false
- Does the token conform to the ERC20 standard?:  Yes
- Are there any novel or unique curve logic or mathematical models?: NA
- Does it use a timelock function?:  N/A
- Is it an NFT?: NO
- Does it have an AMM?: NO  
- Is it a fork of a popular project?:  True; added account abstraction interface on gnosis safe base wallet. execTransaction uses batchId. wallet factory has create2 support
- Does it use rollups?:   false
- Is it multi-chain?:  true
- Does it use a side-chain?: false

Clone the repository: git clone [email protected]:code-423n4/2023-01-biconomy.git

Pre-requisite:

• Create a scw-contracts/.secret file and enter your mnemonic. walletUtils.js picks mnemonic from here and creates accounts for hardhat tasks
• Try the setup instructions below

# Setup
cd scw-contracts
yarn

# Environment
# Do add the RPC URLs and Block explorer API keys for running scripts to deploy on test networks
cp .env.example .env 

# Compile the contracts
npx hardhat compile

# Run the tests
npx hardhat test

# Run coverage
yarn coverage