sintefmath / jutuldarcy.jl Goto Github PK

This issue is used to trigger TagBot; feel free to unsubscribe.

If you haven't already, you should update your TagBot.yml to include issue comment triggers.
Please see this post on Discourse for instructions and more details.

If you'd like for me to do this for you, comment TagBot fix on this issue.
I'll open a PR within a few hours, please be patient!

This line

Hello,

There is an error in writing wells data when simulating JutulSPE1.m.

MRST model: Writing output to C:\Matlab\mrst-2023b\output\jutul\ODEHPROBLEM-IMPLICITOPTION-1200DAYS_GenericBlackOilModel_output_mrst.
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching full_well_outputs(::Jutul.MultiModel{nothing}, ::Vector{Dict{Symbol, Any}}, ::Dict{Any, Any}; shortname::Bool)

Best regards,
Nikolai

Hi!

I just tried running the co2_brine_2d_vertical.jl on my machine (all packages fully up to date) and it fails on the 57th time step:

julia> include("co2_brine_2d_vertical.jl")
Simulation aborted Completed 57 of 206 timesteps in 13 seconds, 844 milliseconds and 754 iterations.
╭────────────────┬──────────┬───────────────┬──────────────┬─────────────╮
│ Iteration type │ Avg/step │  Avg/ministep │     Time per │       Total │
│                │ 58 steps │ 138 ministeps │ Milliseconds │    (wasted) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼───────────────┼──────────────┼─────────────┤
│ Newton         │     13.0 │       5.46377 │      18.3607 │   754 (525) │
│ Linearization  │  15.3793 │       6.46377 │      15.5201 │   892 (560) │
│ Linear solver  │   85.931 │       36.1159 │       2.7777 │ 4984 (3663) │
╰────────────────┴──────────┴───────────────┴──────────────┴─────────────╯
╭────────────────┬──────────────┬────────────┬─────────╮
│ Timing type    │         Each │   Relative │   Total │
│                │ Milliseconds │ Percentage │ Seconds │
├────────────────┼──────────────┼────────────┼─────────┤
│ Properties     │       2.5779 │    14.04 % │  1.9437 │
│ Equations      │       3.1939 │    20.58 % │  2.8490 │
│ Assembly       │       1.2797 │     8.25 % │  1.1415 │
│ Linear solve   │       2.0008 │    10.90 % │  1.5086 │
│ Preconditioner │       1.1168 │     6.08 % │  0.8420 │
│ Update         │       0.9086 │     4.95 % │  0.6851 │
│ Convergence    │       1.9364 │    12.48 % │  1.7273 │
│ Input/Output   │       0.0806 │     0.08 % │  0.0111 │
│ Other          │       4.1586 │    22.65 % │  3.1356 │
├────────────────┼──────────────┼────────────┼─────────┤
│ Total          │      18.3607 │   100.00 % │ 13.8440 │
╰────────────────┴──────────────┴────────────┴─────────╯
┌ Error: Simulation did not complete successfully.
└ @ Jutul ~/.julia/packages/Jutul/hWGJY/src/simulator/print.jl:144

Not quite sure where to look but I thought I would point it out.

Hello,

I encountered the following assertion error when trying to run firstJutulExample.m from MRST 2023b distribution:

julia> simulate_mrst_case("C:/Matlab/mrst-2023b/output/jutul/qfs_wo.mat", write_mrst = true);
MRST model: Reading input file C:/Matlab/mrst-2023b/output/jutul/qfs_wo.mat.
[ Info: This is the first call to simulate_mrst_case. Compilation may take some time...
ERROR: AssertionError: size(C_f) == (dim, nf)

The reason for the error is that in TwoPointFiniteVolumeGeometry (meshes.jl:62) size(C_f) == (2, 4900) but (dim, nf) == (3, 4900).

There was a warning message during project compilation, maybe it is related to the error:

4 dependencies had output during precompilation:
┌ OffsetArrays → OffsetArraysAdaptExt
│ WARNING: failed to initialize stack walk info
└
┌ StaticArrays → StaticArraysStatisticsExt
│ WARNING: failed to initialize stack walk info
└
┌ Compat
│ WARNING: failed to initialize stack walk info
└
┌ ILUZero
│ WARNING: failed to initialize stack walk info

Best regards,
Nikolai

Is there a plan to add the following features:

1. Analysis Aquifer, such as Fetkovich aquifer, Carter-Tracy aquifer
2. Output ECL binary format file, such as egrid, unrst, etc. Convenient to view calculation results in ResInsight.