Describe how CoC committee gets updated about process HOT 5 CLOSED

I propose that it be a volunteer candidate be a simple présentation in solid team with a vote at next or current meeting without the candidate be present at the vote.

from process.

I'll try to elaborate:

Are you suggesting that the candidate is invited to a part of a Solid Team meeting where they can present themselves in which their identity is not disclosed in the minutes (in case there is an objection); candidate leaves the meeting; Solid Team discusses; and if no objections, candidate (or Solid Team) follows-up with a PR?

Also want to note that (based on previous discussion IIRC [citation needed]), membership in CoCC doesn't entail/require membership in Solid Team and vice versa. That's how we approached it at least in the past. IIRC, this was partly so that CoCC can operate independently as a neutral party.

from process.

from process.

Considering the context, it may be appropriate to ensure that CoCC operates independently. It needs to have equal representation as possible without being elected or represented by anyone/entity in particular.

People will get accepted unless there are objections. Objections could be based on the person themselves or other concerns. Such as: we have enough people for the tasks already, etc.

CoCC would be the appropriate team to propose/process candidates. If CoCC approves a candidate internally, the remainder of the process should be in public where they PR themselves to be added to the CoCC, which would give the wider community a chance to respond as well - serving as a double check or catch any oversight.

from process.

Its OK for me

from process.