In RDF use SKOS for Comment and Details fields about ac HOT 7 CLOSED

I support updating

  rdfs:comment "Definition:  -->  skos:definition
  rdfs:comment "Details: --> skos:note

Also the rdfs:label could perhaps be updated to skos:prefLabel?
And perhaps each Audubon Core term might be declared as rdf:type 
skos:Concept...? In addition and complementary to the rdf:Property and 
rdfs:Class type declarations...?

I've done the first two, but there's a broader issue here that maybe needs a 
broader consensus. It's whether the normative term list should itself be cast 
in skos, making such things as you suggest be mandatory in any implementation 
that can express the skos types of AC terms.  This doesn't seem like something 
that should not be done casually. I wonder if such discussion would reasonably 
be part of the hopefully impending public comment. Among my ancillary concerns 
for RDF are that since the W3C Recommendation for skos has an OWL express, we 
would have to take care that AC/RDF is a consistent implementation and also 
figure out what consistency issue might lurk for AC media descriptions. 
OWL-inconsistent data is not per-se bad, but you do have to be careful where 
you toss it, especially into triple stores that reasoners will be used on.

All that said, maybe this RDF maybe this implementation should do the things 
you suggest and we call it something like the AC SKOS/RDF implementation.  
There could be other AC RDF implementations, or an AC SKOS/XML-Schema etc.

I think I can do what you suggest in a day or less.

I said "This doesn't seem like something that should not be done casually".  
Too many negatives.  I mean "That seems like the kind of thing that should not 
be done casually."

Moved to: Issue audubon-core-rdf:3