Darwin Core Geography Terms not represented in trivial RDF about ac HOT 4 CLOSED

Original comment by morris.bob on 25 Nov 2012 at 11:49

• Added labels: Component-RDF

from ac.

Original comment by morris.bob on 3 Dec 2012 at 7:34

• Added labels: Priority-Low
• Removed labels: Priority-High

from ac.

Moved to: Issue audubon-core-rdf:4

Original comment by morris.bob on 1 Mar 2013 at 4:14

• Changed state: Moved

from ac.

OK, I think that this issue has moved out of the realm of AC Maintenance Group problem into the realm of a TAG/Infrastructure problem. All of the pieces necessary to know what borrowed terms are part of AC (including the DwC geography terms) are now present in the https://github.com/tdwg/rs.tdwg.org repo. Those data are drawn upon to generate the new term list at https://github.com/tdwg/ac/blob/documentation-conversion/doc/termlist.md and they will also be drawn upon whenever the system for generating RDF serializations is operational, since it will also draw on the basic metadata in the rs.tdwg.org repo.

Basically, the "trivial RDF" will go away because the Standards Documentation Spec now lays out how trivial RDF (i.e. "bucket of terms" rather than "complex ontology") should be generated automatically from the abstract properties of terms.

from ac.