This should only be enabled in development and turned off in production

If I misclick or change my mind about the challenge type I've just chosen I can't revert my decision.

Can be circumvented by manual resolution of challenges.

As above

House card needs to be able to be knelt to pay for various effects.

Reason: there are multiple action windows that allow players to trigger various effects which can alter game elements in subsequent phases/steps.

action windows:

1. plot phase, after plots are revealed
2. draw phase, after cards are drawn
3. marshalling phase, after collecting income
4. challenges phase
   4.1. pre-challenge
   4.2. after challenge is initiated
   4.3. after defenders are declared and before challenge is resolved
5. dominance phase, after dominance is resolved
6. standing phase, after cards stand
7. taxation phase, after discarding for reserve

Circumvention: many of them can be applied prior to taking actions in subsequent phases, but some of them come too late.

1. skipped. Can be done only after drawing cards during marshalling.
2. can be done before starting to marshall cards (but still after collecting income)
3. ok,
   4.1. ok
   4.2. ok
   4.3. skipped. can be done post automatic challenge resolution only. Probably the most important one.
   5, 6, 7. not sure right now. If I remember correctly all of these can be done only at the end of round.

When choosing a character to target for stealth, currently you can choose another character that has stealth. Per the rules, characters that have stealth are immune to the effects of stealth.

They should be moved to discard pile but instead completely disappear from the game.

If a location is chosen first during setup, it correctly goes to the bottom row. If a character is chosen first, it incorrectly goes to the bottom row. So whichever is chosen first ends up on the bottom row and remains that way for the rest of the game (all characters get marshalled to bottom or vice versa).

If a full row of cards is kneeled, the cards blend into other rows and generally look unpleasant

Reason: many cards instruct player to move a card to bottom of deck.
Example: Greenblood trader - look at the top 2 cards, take 1 in hand and move the other to the bottom of your deck.

It took me a long time during a game to figure out why my end turn button was stuck during dominance, my opponent didn't know either but as we figured out it was the lower reserve value on plot card.
Is there a way to add a notification box (or just text over end turn button) telling player to apply reserve discards? We thought for a few minutes it was a bug, I think this would clarify things.

Opponent choosing Heads on Spikes to my empty hand caused an error.

Chat scrolls to the bottom automatically when a new message is posted, even when scrolling back to read through old messages.

Attachments like Beggar King or Seal of the Hand need to have ability to kneel.

use if(isdefined) rather than if(foo)

1. play a limited card
2. drag that card back to hand
3. try to play another limited card
4. Note that you can't

Examples: Khal Drogo and his ability to declare 2 military challenges. Plot Storm of Swords.

Can be circumvented by manual resolution.

Unique attachments can be played duplicated for free just like with characters and locations.

When in a game, moving to the general front page, then back to the game causes the game chat window to be scrolled to the top.

Can you add a chat sentence to tell each player which challenge was reduced by 1 when calm over westeros is revealed? (automation, not necessary)

Quite often it happens that a player is disconnected because of a connection failure. Allow for him/her to join back to the game.

Keep the state of the game upon disconnection (other than through Leave button) while the opponent is still in the game. It is up to the player whether he wants to keep waiting for the disconnected player or leaves the game. It could be a new command (/rejoin, /reconnect) or a new button and the connection is then restored and the game can continue.

Any card with a counter on it cannot be dragged to any location

cards containing keywords in their text, but not keywords themselves, trigger those keywords.

Examples:

1. Septa Mordane gives renown to Sansa Stark, but triggers renown on her own challenges.
2. Doreah gains insight only when attacking together with Lord or Lady, but triggers it on her own.

1. When a character with an attachment leaves play that attachment disappears from the game (happened with Crown of gold)
2. Confiscation - when removing opponent's attachment from my character that attachment is moved to my discard pile instead of its owner's discard pile (happened with Milk of the poppy)
3. Attachments once attached cannot be moved manually to other play areas, discard pile, hand, etc. (happened with Stinking drunk)

I'm not able to see my and opponent plot.

Here is a list of things we talked about

1. Discard Random card Button
2. Look at top X
3. Action Windows:
   -Before Challenges
   -Before declare defenders
   -After declare defenders
4. Take control effects: Ward, Taking the Black, The Night Gathers ...
5. Faction Card Kneel

Cheers,
Ivan (uBaH)

P.S. Not everything needs to be automated. Dominance, Reserve prompt, Counting income are good beginning.

Right now the game has a small player base, that sets back the testing too. I have only played it when I found someone to join. The one time I got someone to join my game I was checking the tab every minute or so which became a little tedious. Is there a way you could add a notification so as to make it easier for people to start games, I think it would make it easier in the beginning for players to create games.

i am a author of agotv2 octgn,your work is amazing!

See title. This makes it harder to see who was claimed, as well as mess up potential interactions (ex: reinforcements)

Example: when Viserys leaves play, he can remove an attachment. You can't do it manually.
Also, When a character or leaves play, the non-terminal attachments disappear.

e.g. Trading with the pentoshi, if both players select it, when revealed it gives 3 gold to one player twice instead of to each player

On two separate occasions, marched to the wall kept triggering until almost every character on both sides of the board was discarded, followed by a game crash.

Feature: implement command /show x (x is the number of first x cards from the top of the deck)
Reason: many cards allow you to look at or search first x cards of your deck, for example:
Greenblood Trader: /show 2
Summons: /show 10
Upcoming Pyat Pree: /show x (x is variable based on challenge result)

Locations and characters can be deduced from the placement on the board in the setup phase.

This is caused by the card information being sent to the client when the face is facedown and does not belong to the player

At the moment you can manually put characters and locations into play during marshalling by dragging them onto the field. However, you can't do so during challenges. This is crucial for cards like Arianne or the new Moon Brothers. I would appreciate, if this could be fixed.

Also, you can kneel almost everything except for the faction card. This requires only a small fix, and would make cards like I Never Bet Against My Family usable... well, maybe not THAT card, but you get the idea.

Thank you for developing this software. It already looks very slick.

Feature: Stop resolving When revealed abilities of plots automatically when plots are chosen.

Reason: It is up to the first player who determines in what order plots are triggered. There are many situations when the order of When revealed abilities makes a difference.

Note: It is much easier to allow players handle different abilities manually, e.g. draw, kill, basically moving cards around. Implementing each plot ability automatically is time consuming, error prone and inflexible.

If a card has attachments or dupes when it is discarded or put in the dead pile, the cards that were attached are removed from the game instead of being placed in the correct location

Need ability to manually set house power for things not implemented yet (LotC bonus, etc)

Reason: many cards instruct player to shuffle a card into his/her deck.
Examples:
Benjen Stark - after BS is killed, shuffle him into owner's deck
Rebuilding - choose 3 cards from discard pile and shuffle into your deck

Agendas i believe are the final card type we have yet to get an example of. As most non banner agendas have some sort of ability (KoS needs to add the gold for summer plots, etc) these should be a top priority to add sooner rather than later.

I would like to know who is online when I log in. That way, I will know whether or not it is a good idea to start a game.

At the moment there is a weird mix of automation and manual control which I believe hurts the playability. For example, after declaring defenders it goes straight to challenge resolution. This basically makes Targaryen an unplayable faction right now. If they want to burn a defender this would likely change the challenge winner, causing the need for lots of stuff to be rewound, which oftentimes can be hard to do. If you want to automate the challenges themselves (which would be cool but probably very hard) you would need to include steps for every action window (which both players would need to pass consecutively before moving on) as well as options for reacting to winning/losing, interrupting or replacing claim, reacting/interrupting to keywords etc. Also all the less-important phases like standing and taxation and their action phases would need to be included. Without that this will probably be useful/playable but won’t be a serious tool for playing the game which is needed if you want it to reach jinteki heights I think.

In the meantime it’s probably better (and easier) to at least make it possible to do everything manually. For example just kneeling a card, typing “mil” in the chatbox and handling the resolution yourself. There would need to be commands for drawing, looking at the top x cards of the top/bottom of the deck, putting any kind of tokens on cards, etc. Most of that is already implemented I believe but not all. It would more or less be like playing on OCTGN, except better because it's browser-based and has a much cleaner interface. Let me know what you think and if you need any help with game rules for example. :)