tolbrino / hut Goto Github PK

I'm using exometer from an Elixir app and log messages are being repeated twice. I guess I need to configure hut to report to lager, which is configured to log through logger.

The normal way to configure an application in Elixir is though Erlang's application environment. Is it possible to configure hut this way?

Hi @tolbrino, Hope you're safe and well.

bamboo_smtp package is already dependent on [email protected] and on the other hand OTP24+ no longer supports rebar2.

Sample Warning

dependency :hut is using Rebar 2, which is no longer maintained and no longer works in recent Erlang/OTP versions. Remove the :manager option or set it to :rebar3 instead

What's your thought on this and is it possible to get rid of this warning by suggested message?

Hi. I'm working on jlouis/turtle#8 trying to make it available as a hex package. hut is a transitive dependency of that project and so I would also like to make this project available as a hex package.

Is this something that the maintainers of this project are interested in?
You could publish it by adding a mix.exs file or by using the rebar3 plugin for hex publishing. I'd be happy to help out with a PR for either one of those solutions if you are interested. Thanks for all your work making great open source tools ❤️ 😍 🎉

what 1.0.0 is > 1.1.0 ?

I'm wondering if you have any example that show how to use hut with rebar3 in a library and setup the logger (log library) from the project using the it. Any hint is welcome :)

priestjim/gen_rpc#82 describes an issue found on gen_rpc, any idea what might be causing this?

Currently HUT_CUSTOM backend tries to manage log levels via ?maybe_log macro and hut application environment. I think it may be reasonable to make behavior of HUT_CUSTOM dumber and let the callback manage log levels and what not. Real world example: suppose we want to integrate an application using hut into an old system with its own custom logging framework. It already has the necessary configuration, there's no need to duplicate it in hut.

I can do the necessary changes either by introducing a new hut backend or just fixing the existing one (and breaking the BC).

Hello,

Do you think it is possible to support OTP21's new logger?

http://erlang.org/doc/apps/kernel/logger_chapter.html

https://ferd.ca/erlang-otp-21-s-new-logger.html

Following a quick discussion on IRC it appeared that hut don't have the buildtool metadat set which prevents people using rebar3 to use it:

 rebar3 hex search hut  return nothing but https://hex.pm/packages?search=hut&sort=downloads
20:33 return a version

20:38 E<ericmj> 
benoitc: i think rebar3 only searches for packages that use rebar3
20:39 and hut hasn’t set any build tool

Can you eventually resend a new version on hex?