Only the top-level package is packaged.

Given I've a list of optimizations
When I select one or several optimizations, and ask for deletion
Then selected optimizations are removed and I see feedback on the list

OpenMDAO accepts that constraints are defined using a lower and an upper value.

Could WhatsOpt allow to define such constraint ?

• Enable sharing the optimization problem to other people (e.g. for inspection or feedback)
• Allow removing or stopping/killing of optimization problems
• Improve insight in infill points generated by the optimizer
  • Display infilled points in a different color in the plots
  • Highlight hovered points in all points (e.g. I'm hovering over a point in one of the scatter plots --> I want to see the same point highlighted in the other plots)
• Better documentation of optimizer settings

With the number of analyses increasing and the pagination of the analyses list, there is a need for a searching feature.
Typically the user should be able to input some substring which will be matched against at least the id/name of the analysis or the name of the owner or a tag

In order to allow the proper automated usage of metamodels through the REST API, the user should be able to retrieve information about meta models through the REST API:

• list of available metamodels: ids
• for a metamodel, the input and output dimensions and information about the columns (variable names)

Given I've access to the list of optimizations
When I ask for an optimization with given parameters: optimizer type, xtypes, options, ...
Then an optimization is created in 'pending' status is added to the list

Given I've an optimization with points,
When I am on the optimization list and click on the given optimization,
Then I get to the detailed information page where I see plots of optimization data

Given I've an optimization
When I am on the detailed information page
Then I can get data from optimization in a csv format datafile.

The variable table can be ordered according to any column, in ascending and descending order. And that is very useful when having a lot of variables.

Nevertheless, during edition, modifying any field (role, lower/upper value...) resets immediately the order to default, which can be a bit annoying 😅.

Given I've made 20 optimizations,
When I create an Optimization
Then I get an error message 'Too many optimizations' and an information on how to solve the problem

Having a use case with (very) long variable names, I would appreciate to be able to modify the width of some columns in the variable table.

ATM, the package first upload date is provided

Should move from travis and use Github Actions to run CI tests.

Should add documentation related to:

• architecture: main components, mechanism, API interfaces, GUI
• administration: user creation, authentication, authorization
• ...

Given I've a terminated an optimization,
When I ask for the log of the run
Then I get a text file with the traces of the optimizer run

Considering the analysis Foo with the Bar discipline, in the code that WhatsOpt 1.14.3 generates, we have:

class FooBase(Group):
    ...
    def create_bar(self):
        return Bar()

and

class FooFactoryBase(object):
    ...
    def create_bar(self):
        return Bar()

Therefore, one that would want to overload create_bar() should do it twice, in Foo and FooFactory, which is not DRY.

Generated python files doesn't respect totally the PEP8 recommendations. Since WOP use a code generator, it should be great to have PEP8 compliant files in order to promote the PEP8.

Given I've an optimization in 'pending' status
When I ask for running it
Then the optimization is started in 'running' status and I see the optimization progress (nb iterations)

Having a use case with lots of variables, I would appreciate to have the title row always visible, especially in edit mode, to be sure to know what fields I am modifying.

Given I've made no optimization,
When I browse the Optimizations page
Then I see an information message (links to optimization tutorial, optimization REST API)

Unlike other generated run_*.py files, run_doe.py, generated by WhatsOpt 1.14.3, does not have a line with initialize(pb) after the problem setup.

Given I've made optimizations through wop Python API
When I click on Optimizations item on WhatsOpt navbar
Then I see the list of my optimizations: id, status, creation date, number of points

When you creates an analysis with a disciplinary with the same name, the generated code doesn't provide the disciplinary file since it should have the same name than the analysis.

I suggest to export filenames with suffix for one of analysis or disciplinary files.

Hello,
in generated code for OpenMDAO, I would greatly appreciate if units could be specified in following methods:

• set_input_defaults()
• add_design_var()
• add_objective()
• add_constraint()

The current generation does not leverage the mixed integer capabilities of SMT

In the setup() of the problem.model, WhatsOpt creates an IndepVarComp instance to fill problem inputs.

Such IndepVarComp is no more needed since OpenMDAO 3.2.

And in some cases (that indeed do not fully respect the convention to have all variables promoted), WhatsOpt may wrongly identify a variable as an input, needed in the IVC.

Therefore I kindly suggest to remove this IndepVarComp from the generated code.

Seems there is a compatibility issue with previous versions. To be investigated

Given I 've several optimizations
When I select at least two optimizations and click 'Plot'
Then I see a plot comparison with data from the selected optimizations