--contig-end-exclusion doesn't work with -m not set to mean about coverm HOT 2 OPEN

Thanks Alex, much appreciated for the bug and the kind words.

I think this is really an issue with count, not with non-mean methods, agree?

What would be a good definition that accounts for reads that cross the boundary? Starting position for start of contig and end for end of contig?

from coverm.

Hi Ben,
So, I see this issue with -m covered_bases and -m covered_fraction in my data as well, do you see that as well?

I'm actually not sure I follow your second question - my guess would be best for the parameter to be a hard cutoff, so that any read that crosses the boundary (e.g. the 100 bp from the edge by default) at all is not counted.

from coverm.