Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

prpn's People

Contributors

explorerfreda avatar hantek avatar yikangshen avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

prpn's Issues

Ablation test results do not match with those presented in the paper

Hi,
I am trying to verify the experiment results presented in the original paper. I made some changes to the code in order to perform the ablation test. My code is on https://github.com/duanqn/PRPN/tree/LMparse
diff: master...duanqn:LMparse
I'm doing the first ablation test, which is to remove parsing network and replace structured attention with normal ones.
I have run the original code on Penn Treebank dataset, getting 61.53 perplexity (which is similar to 61.98 in the paper). After removing the parsing network, I got 62.18 test PPL which is different from 64.42 in the paper.
Right now I'm not sure if I modified the network correctly. Could you please show me the right way to change the structure of the network?

Thanks,
Qingnan

right-branching result do not match with that presented in the paper

Hi,
I am trying to compute right-branching and upper bound baselines on the WSJ10 dataset. When I use the code in prpn to evaluation, I get 56.68 (right-branching) and 84.06 (upper bound), different from 61.7(RBranch) 88.1(upper bound) in the paper. But when I use EvalB to do the evaluation, I get 61.7(RBranch) 88.1(upper bound).
So is that mean the way to evaluate the right-branching structure is different from prpn model? Could you please show the right way to compute right-branching and upper bound baselines on the WSJ10 dataset?

Thanks,
Yunfan

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.