On follow-up, Adverse Event column should force choice of “Yes”, “No”, or “Inconclusive” and “If Adverse Event: Severity?” column should force choice of “Mild”, “Moderate”, or “Severe”. about eacjr HOT 24 CLOSED

and honestly, thinking about the TH row, we don't need the visual cues there anyway.

(Welcome to the Redundancy Department of Redundancy)

from eacjr.

After thinking about this one, I've relabeled it as a bug rather than an enhancement because as it currently stands, it is not correct.

from eacjr.

The reason for the difference in my mind. "It works as I wrote it" so it's not a broken part, it's a change on how things are done.

from eacjr.

see commit 521c2fc

from eacjr.

Close but slightly off. "Yes/No/Inconclusive" should be in column that currently says "No/Change?". If AE, OMT Related? column should look like the others (Definitely/Probably/Not Sure/Unlikely/No).

from eacjr.

S'not what you said...

from eacjr.

S'to. 😆 "Adverse Event column should force choice of “Yes”, “No”, or “Inconclusive”"

from eacjr.

waaaaaah! (check now?)

from eacjr.

That works. If you took out the "No" and "Change?" at the top, I think it would be perfect.

from eacjr.

So.... you don't want a visual of "change?"

from eacjr.

No, because we don't really have a way to say automatically on the follow-up questions whether it is a "Yes" or "No" since there's no severity change or something like that. So it really is that the EAC is deciding whether it is an AE or not, rather than changing from the algorithm-determined status.

from eacjr.

No no.. I mean the word "Change?" Is there a better way to say that?

from eacjr.

(Since Pt. reports it as an AE and the jury is voting to accept that or reject that)

from eacjr.

Ah. They're not reporting it as an AE. They're just reporting that it occurred. So, they're reporting they had a visit to a doctor. It doesn't mean the patient thought it was an AE. It could have been for a wellness check, for example. That's why it's different from the symptoms.

from eacjr.

All of the symptoms are "bad things" whereas a visit to the doctor might or might not be a bad thing.

from eacjr.

disagree, Clearly, this one said "Definitely [related to OMT]"

from eacjr.

else - what are we "Changing?"

from eacjr.

But they say "Definitely" when they are going to get another treatment.

from eacjr.

(right, and then your Jury over-rides that with "AE=NO")

from eacjr.

But how did you know that it was a "Yes" to begin with? The EAC has to make a decision on every follow-up visit and I think it is less confusing for them if there are no "preconceived ideas".

from eacjr.

hurm.

from eacjr.

I used "Adverse Event?" as the visual header, maybe that's more clear?

from eacjr.

Okay, I think that's what you want now, @jcjohnsonmo - Please double check when you have time.

from eacjr.

YES!!!!

from eacjr.