Implementation of protocols for MultiFn about bidi HOT 2 OPEN

This seems reasonable. It might even make sense to double check there's not a common ancestor protocol.

from bidi.

That is a great idea. I looked a bit further into this, and found that extending these protocols to clojure.lang.AFn using the existing clojure.lang.Fn implementations works as expected for MultiFn:

(extend-protocol bidi/Matched
  clojure.lang.AFn
  (resolve-handler [this m] (bidi/succeed this m))
  (unresolve-handler [this m] (when (= this (:handler m)) "")))

(extend-protocol bidi.ring/Ring
  clojure.lang.AFn
  (request [f req _] (f req)))

This approach would obviously extend to regular fns as well. As a consumer (naive outsider perspective, apply as many grains of salt as appropriate 😂), it seems intuitive to treat MultiFn identically to Fn in this case, given the implementations. Doing so would require almost no effort—I'd be happy to submit a PR if the team is open to it.

Otherwise, I don't mind including the extension in each instance of relevant bidi-consuming code. In any case, I really appreciate the extensibility of the design—it has made the library super easy to work with. Thank you! 🙏

from bidi.