nickczh / pe Goto Github PK

After prompting me if I want to add any details, I chose 8 which is help, and it automatically adds the grocery for me which is not intended.

It skips the step even though I inputted 8, which may misled users.

In the 6. Edit grocery amount in DG, the tiny arrowhead beside stores description (circled in red) may not be necessary.

Perhaps a grocery should not be added in with infinite cost?

I use listcost to check the cost again, the price of the grocery is infinity.

When I input update, and failed to input my weight for multiple times, it sets it to '0':

Perhaps defaulting to Nil might be better as there is no one who weight 0.0 able to use the app.

After adding the expiry date, I checked it with listexp:

I am presented with this Ui after choosing the grocery mode. The layout appears to be different from the UG, with my layout being more cluttered. Here is the comparison:

My layout:

UG:

The UG appears to have padding and spaces while the actual program does not. Small cosmetic issue.

As seen from the image, step 34 is empty by simply adding two periods ...

Dummy testing report for PE later.

Perhaps the image diagram in the next page could be made abit smaller so that it could be fit inside the same page?

Perhaps it might be better to not accept invalid characters in grocery category.

To check, I use list:

I am able to add a groceries with invalid names with special characters:

To confirm that it is added, I use list

In the calories mode, I input eat chicken with a very high calories count

After viewing the calories consumed, perhaps it might be better to catch invalid calories count which are too high?

Absence of closing bracket in diagram in DG under 8. Edit the threshold amount of a grocery after adding (Circled in red).

Perhaps not all getters and setters have to be included? This helps to keep the class diagram brief and only include essential details for clarity.

From this image, if I input the following:

It still prompts me to input the recipe title again, making the UG unreliable because the command format is redundant.

Remarks could probably filter bad and invalid characters:

To check, I used list:

Negative amount for groceries is accepted

I have input -5

To check, I used list