visceral-project / evaluatesegmentation Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA program to evaluate the quality of image segmentations.
License: Apache License 2.0
A program to evaluate the quality of image segmentations.
License: Apache License 2.0
If the ground truth mask is empty (no positive classes - which is clearly possible in real life), it shows this error.
Hi, while trying both -use all and -use ...,COEFVAR,... along with others, I found that the generated xml file only contains 21 evaluation metrics. The missing one is COEFVAR. Could you please fix this issue.
Thanks
Naved
hi guys, great little tool which usually works great. however I sometimes encouter the situation that after initializing processing of two labels, the tool seems to do something but does not yield any results and goes back to a blinking cursor without any output. any idea what this signifies?
I have two different images:
human.png
model.png
Then I do:
$ EvaluateSegmentation human.png model.png -xml out.xml -use DICE,JACRD,ICCORR
Similarity:
DICE = 0.658228 Dice Coefficient (F1-Measure)
JACRD = 0.490566 Jaccard Coefficient
ICCORR = 0.658228 Interclass Correlation
DICE == ICCORR
: Coincidence or bug?
I have tried to run the Windows pre-compiled exe on a large volume (1024,1024,500). The output is "Memory allocation 2 !" I assume this means that the program cannot allocate sufficient memory. Is there any work around (other than using smaller datasets?)
First, let me thank you for this great tool.
I am using your tool for some automatic lesion segmentation. Question is: what does the Hausdorff variables represent, number of voxels or the metric distance in millimeters.
Dorian
thank you very much for providing this tool. it would be helpful if versions were provided of this tool. this can be done with the help of github releases.
releasing versions of this tool would have several benefits
what i am suggesting should not take too much effort. i am also happy to help with this if people would find this useful. having even one published version would be particularly helpful.
Hey,
I noticed that the Rand Index here is calculated by (a + d)/(a + b + c + d)
.
But shouldn't it be (a + b)/(a + b + c + d)
?
Best regards
Dear sir,
How to use your code?
Average displacement is among the best metric measurements of segmentation accuracy. It would complete the need for accuracy measures if that is among the output of this tool.
Suggesting this because the average displacement I compute with other software does not match well the one currently given. The best would be the average distance between both sides.
Dorian
I noticed the Ubuntu build in EvaluateSegmentation-2020.08.28-Ubuntu.zip crashes when comparing two .nii volumes without providing the -xml
argument. When providing the -xml
argument it executes successfully. I am using Ubuntu 20.04.2.
./EvaluateSegmentation femur_left_manual.nii femur_left_automatic.nii -help -use DICE
returns:
Similarity:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
./EvaluateSegmentation femur_left_manual.nii femur_left_automatic.nii -help -use DICE -xml results.xml
returns:
Similarity:
DICE = 0.942233 Dice Coefficient (F1-Measure)
Distance:
Classic Measures:
Total execution time= 1671 milliseconds
---** VISCERAL 2013, www.visceral.eu **---
when I run EvaluateSegmentation -help
, I do not see the full help message. i did some debugging and the problem is related to the for loop referenced below:
EvaluateSegmentation/source/EvaluateSegmentation.cxx
Lines 64 to 68 in a10b393
in other words, the following section is not shown in the help message:
-default or -def =reads default options from a file default.txt in the current folder. All the options above except image filenames can be used as defaults. Default options are overridden by options given in the command line.
Example:
/usr/local/bin/EvaluateSegmentation groundtruth.nii segment.nii -use RNDIND,[email protected]@,[email protected]@ -xml result.xml
2)For help on evaluation of landmark, type: /usr/local/bin/EvaluateSegmentation -loc
3)For help on lesion detection evaluation, type: /usr/local/bin/EvaluateSegmentation -det
---** VISCERAL 2013, www.visceral.eu **---
i was able to fix it with the following, but this isn't a true fix, because there must be an underlying issue somewhere else.
if (i == (METRIC_COUNT-1)) {
break;
}
previous versions of this tool did not have this issue (for example, the earlier builds in the builds
directory). But the most recent Ubuntu build does have this problem.
i don't know c/c++, so i'm afraid i can't help much with debugging further.
When running your pre-compiled Ubuntu package, the use -METHOD
flag does not really have any effect on the actual measures being computed.
I tried with simply:
./EvaluateSegmentation labels.tif segmentation.tif –use RNDIND -xml result.xml
And wanting to exclude the time-intensive AVGDIST with:
./EvaluateSegmentation labels.tif segmentation.tif -use DICE,JACRD,GCOERR,VOLSMTY,KAPPA,AUC,RNDIND,ADJRIND,ICCORR,MUTINF,FALLOUTCOEFVAR,VARINFO,PROBDST,MAHLNBS,SNSVTY,SPCFTY,PRCISON,[email protected]@,ACURCY -xml result.xml
and in both cases all measures are being computed.
Thanks anyway for the excellent tool that came really handy in evaluating our segmentations :)
Hello,
I want to evaluate a multiclass segmentation and I used your tool (which is efficient and easy to use, thanks!), but I guess I found an error when computing the metrics between the background of my ground truth segmentation and the background of my test segmentation. I created a nifti file containing 1 for the background and 0 for the other classes. Then since I evaluate small classes, this segmentation (background) fills nearly all the field of view of my nifti file.
But when I compute the metrics between these two segmentations (ground truth background and test background), I get an xml file with wrong values, for instance a DICE of 0.5, which is clearly underestimate, or a number of False Positive voxels way too high.
It seems that the 2 segmentations files are seen as shifted in relation to each other. Of course I checked their volume, resolution, and transform matrix but all these properties are identical for the two images. I opened the 2 files with FSL and ITKSnap, to ensure their overlap and they are definitely not shifted.
So I don't really know where does this error come from, and I am afraid that this error could have occur when comparing the other classes of my multiclass experiment.
Do you have an idea about how to fix this issue ?
Thanks a lot for your help !
PS : In order to reproduce this issue, I attach the 2 nifti files containing the segmentations and a txt file containing the resulting metrics (I just converted the output xml file in txt since github doesn't support xml files).
GroundThruth_Seg.nii.gz
Test_Seg.nii.gz
Metric_computed.txt
When I run exe in my Windows,Error:
itk::ExceptionObject (01B8F780)
Location: "unknown"
File: c:\itk 4.4.2\source\modules\core\common\include\itkMatrix.h
Line: 240
Description: itk::ERROR: Singular matrix. Determinant is 0.
Can you help me out?
I have been using the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance function in this tool, and have seen that while it calculates the max HD correctly, it seems to have problems with calculating percentile distances, drastically over-reporting the actual value. For example,
$ EvaluateSegmentation label1.nii.gz label2.nii.gz -use [email protected]@
this command will give me an HD95 of 12.845233 (units: voxel). The average HD of these two labels (-use AVGDIST) is 0.159714 voxels. Looking at a different HD95 implementation (https://github.com/deepmind/surface-distance) for the same example, it gives the same max HD as this tool, but a much lower 95th percentile HD of 2.23 voxels (which seems to be correct, as this implementation also outputs the raw distance values generated and I could calculate the percentile myself). Could you please look into this issue?
Dear Abdel,
First, thank you very much for your implementation and great review of evaluation metrics.
I may have found a problem with your Hausdorff distance (HD) implementation. In your paper (An Efficient Algorithm for Calculating the Exact Hausdorff Distance), you write that the implementation is easily extendible to the quantile HD (Section 3.6). Unfortunately, I found that the quantile HD based on your algorithm does not yield deterministic results and the results are different compared to other implementations (note that the exact HD seems to be correct). I think the non-deterministic results might arise due to random sampling and the different results to other algorithms due to the early breaking in your algorithm.
I created three ground truth / segmentation examples (download here), which all yield different 95th HD in different runs. You can download the examples here (mha and png images) and run your script (version 2017.04.25) to reproduce my findings:
./EvaluateSegmentation ./EXAMPLE1_GROUNDTRUTH.mha ./EXAMPLE1_SEGMENTATION.mha -use [email protected]@
Can you please comment on this and do you have a fix for this issue?
Best,
Fabian
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.