These are scripts for pan-cancer tumor infiltrating myeloid cells analysis.
panmyeloid's Introduction
panmyeloid's People
Forkers
mengchengyao jhuanglabpaper drfengchenzhao xiachenrui dragonlongzhilin chenmengpin poshine lzlgboy mil2041 huaichao2018 bigfacebig crsky1023 kenichi-shimada drsei anu-bioinfo helianthuszhu xiangrong7 yong-jiang daisyyr jhuanglablearn gladelephant merckey anvajhhf petercss zhengxj1 shengxinbaixiaosheng huizhong1993 devilwsw ustbcaoqipanmyeloid's Issues
Questions About Integration HCL dataset and 10X scRNA dataset
Hi Sijin,
Hope you are doing well and don't mind me asking some questions about the methods or workflows regarding the scRNAseq analysis part.
I noticed in the paper, you have done some integration (human cell landscape)HCL dataset with your own 10X dataset by Scanorama, and used the integrated corrected expression value for comparison on some genes.
We want to do something similar but have failed on the integration. It seems like almost every gene shows same trend that HCL cells have higher expression level compared to the 10X.
So I am wondering could you share some of your insights or suggestions on how to do the integration via Scanorama?
Thanks!
Any response would be appreciated!
Shaowen
Questions About Marker-based Annotation and Normalization for MEL datasets
Hi Sijin,
Nice job and Congrats. I hope you don't mind if I ask some questions about the analytical procedure.
1). As is mentioned in Results, you and your team analyzed each dataset independently and performed marker-based annotation. But when I tried to reproduce the result using LUNG, MEL and newly generated datasets, I can hardly see the enrichment of the cell markers you provided In the paper. (Figure below is from LUNG dataset and I followed the protocol from the paper with same pacgage version) Could you give me some advice about how to annotate the dataset on such situation?
2). I also noticed that MEL datasets used in the paper only available for TPM data, so should it be normalized by library-size further? (normalize_total()
and loglp()
were employed) Would it cause something like 'over-normalization'?
Thanks for your time and all the best,
Yiling
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.