[PRE REVIEW]: Sound-Extraction: A Python package for subsampling audio files about joss-reviews HOT 21 CLOSED

@prayagnshah the investigation is still ongoing, apologies for the delay. Our editorial team has built up a bit of a backlog of tasks over the summer, and many members went on annual leave at some point as well. I imagine it should be done soon though, as most have returned from their annual leave for instance. I'll post a reminder on this scope review to our editors now. (Note that the AEiC on this track is officially @gkthiruvathukal, but I'm jumping in on occasion to help out.)

from joss-reviews.

Thanks, @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (for also being awesome in general). It has been a busy summer and beginning of semester to say the least. I am hoping to catch up soon.

from joss-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (410.2 files/s, 67211.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           7            408            291           1002
Markdown                         5            188              0            340
TeX                              1             13              0            179
YAML                             1              1              4             18
Dockerfile                       1              4              5              5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            15            614            300           1544
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

from joss-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 1652

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3390/s19030553 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13660 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110027 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustic indices estimate breeding bird species richness with daily and seasonally variable effectiveness in lowland temperate Białowieża forest
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106953 may be a valid DOI for title: Assessing the potential of acoustic indices for protected area monitoring in the Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101242 may be a valid DOI for title: Long-term deep learning-facilitated environmental acoustic monitoring in the Capital Region of New York State
- 10.1890/12-2088.1 may be a valid DOI for title: Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

from joss-reviews.

@prashjha the AEiC in this track is @gkthiruvathukal. However, I am here helping out here to help with initial steps. For the moment you can try to address the above paper compilation error. I believe it relates to the fact that you paper YAML lacks any entry for affiliations:, if you add that the error may be resolved. Separately I believe think you can remove the equal-contrib parts as these seem not needed in your cause (I do not think this is causing the error though).

Secondly you may try to address the potential DOI issues identified by our system ☝️ , you can edit your .bib file and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again, also you can call @editorialbot generate pdf to update the paper.

Finally, given the relatively small size of this submission, I am going to ask the board for help to determine if this work is in scope for JOSS. The scope review will determine if this work conforms to out substantial scholarly effort criteria. This scope review usually takes about 2 weeks to complete.

Let me know if you have any questions.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot query scope

from joss-reviews.

Submission flagged for editorial review.

from joss-reviews.

@prashjha the AEiC in this track is @gkthiruvathukal. However, I am here helping out here to help with initial steps. For the moment you can try to address the above paper compilation error. I believe it relates to the fact that you paper YAML lacks any entry for affiliations:, if you add that the error may be resolved. Separately I believe think you can remove the equal-contrib parts as these seem not needed in your cause (I do not think this is causing the error though).

Secondly you may try to address the potential DOI issues identified by our system ☝️ , you can edit your .bib file and call @editorialbot check references here to check them again, also you can call @editorialbot generate pdf to update the paper.

Finally, given the relatively small size of this submission, I am going to ask the board for help to determine if this work is in scope for JOSS. The scope review will determine if this work conforms to out substantial scholarly effort criteria. This scope review usually takes about 2 weeks to complete.

Let me know if you have any questions.

I think you wanted to mention @prayagnshah

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot check references

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.3390/s19030553 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13660 is OK
- 10.1890/12-2088.1 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110027 may be a valid DOI for title: Acoustic indices estimate breeding bird species richness with daily and seasonally variable effectiveness in lowland temperate Białowieża forest
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106953 may be a valid DOI for title: Assessing the potential of acoustic indices for protected area monitoring in the Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101242 may be a valid DOI for title: Long-term deep learning-facilitated environmental acoustic monitoring in the Capital Region of New York State

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot check references

from joss-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110027 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106953 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101242 is OK
- 10.3390/s19030553 is OK
- 10.1111/2041-210X.13660 is OK
- 10.1890/12-2088.1 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot generate pdf

from joss-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from joss-reviews.

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman ,

Do you think there have been any updates to the query scope? 😊

from joss-reviews.

@prayagnshah – many thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after review by the JOSS editorial team we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion.

The feeling of the editorial team was that this package doesn't seem to provide enough value, nor differentiate itself from other tools at this moment but we would encourage the authors to extend the package and submit later.

One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

from joss-reviews.

@editorialbot reject

from joss-reviews.

Paper rejected.

from joss-reviews.